IACHR Press and Communication Office
Tel: +1 (202) 370-9000
cidh-prensa@oas.org
Washington, D.C. – The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
(IACHR) is happy to report that, in 2018, it identified six approved
friendly settlements that had attained full compliance. The IACHR
therefore decided to stop supervising those settlements.
Those reports are mentioned in the Commission’s 2018 Annual Report: Case
12,710, Report 102/14, Marcos Gilberto Chaves and Sandra Chaves, Argentina;
Case 12,745, Report 97/05, Alfredo Díaz Bustos, Bolivia; Case 12,769, Report
65/14, Irineo Martínez Torres y Candelario, Mexico; Petition 288-08, Report
69/16, Jesús Salvador Ferreyra González, Peru; Petition 1339-07, Report
70/16, Tito Guido Gallegos Gallegos, Peru; and Case 12,383, Report 137/17,
Néstor Alejandro Albornoz Eyzaguirre, Peru.
Concerning the degree of compliance with the provisions and measures
stipulated in approved settlements, the Commission notes that progress was
made in the implementation of 106 measures (with 69 reparation measures
attaining total compliance, 20 reparation measures attaining substantial
partial compliance, and 17 reparation measures attaining partial
compliance). Of the 106 measures where progress was made in 2018, 48 were
structural and 58 were individual measures. The IACHR observed a significant
improvement in full compliance with reparation measures, compared to the 16
provisions where full compliance had been attained in 2017.
In its 2018 Annual Report, the IACHR observed that the countries that saw
the most progress in measure implementation were Colombia (where 29 measures
were implemented in 2018); Argentina (where 26 provisions were implemented);
Peru (where 23 measures stipulated in friendly settlements were
implemented); and Guatemala (where major progress was made in 12 reparation
measures). Other countries that showed progress in the implementation of
settlements they had signed were Mexico (where full compliance was attained
concerning three measures); Chile (where full compliance was attained
regarding four provisions); and Brazil and Venezuela (that attained full
implementation of three provisions each).
The Commission appreciates the efforts made by the States of Argentina,
Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru and Venezuela. The
IACHR congratulates those countries on progress made to implement friendly
settlements containing the commitments they made in agreement with victims
and their families, and on compliance with the IACHR’s decisions to approve
such settlements. (To access compliance details, please go to the
Appendix.)
In the 2018 Annual Report, five new issues were accepted for monitoring.
Four of them were at the partial compliance stage, while another one shows
full compliance. Those issues were the following: Case 12,854, Report 36/17,
Ricardo Javier Kaplun, Argentina; Case 12,712, Report 135/17, Rubén Darío
Arroyave, and Case 12,714, Report 137/17, Belén Altavista massacre,
Colombia; Case 12,627, Report 92/17, María Nicolasa García Reynoso, Mexico;
and Case 12,383, Report 137/17, Néstor Alejandro Albornoz Eyzaguirre, Peru.
Finally, six approval reports were issued in 2018 that are set to be
monitored in the 2019 Annual Report: Petition 687/11, Report 138/18,
Gabriela Blas Blas and her daughter C.B.B., Chile; Case 12,941, Report
92/18, Nicolasa and family, and Petition 799/06, Report 93/18, Isidoro León
Ramírez and others, Colombia; Case 12,957, Report 167/18, Bolívar Hernández,
Ecuador; Case 12,699, Report 130/18, Pedro Antonio Centurión, Paraguay; and
Petition 1516/08, Report 123/18, Juan Figueroa Acosta, Peru. In this
context, the Commission commends the work done by the States of Chile and
Paraguay, who attained substantial compliance of the friendly settlements
mentioned above. The IACHR asks them to prioritize those issues in 2019, so
full compliance can be established in the next Annual Report.
Chapter II.G.3 in the IACHR’s Annual Report reflects the adoption of new
work methods, to comply with the strategic goal of expanding the friendly
settlement mechanism, as stated in the IACHR’s Strategic Plan 2017-2021. One
of the new methods adopted is the redesign of Chapter II.G.3, to enable a
more profound analysis of each case, along with greater visibility for
improvements and challenges concerning compliance with IACHR decisions on
petitions and cases. Further, in the context of its policy to expand the
friendly settlement mechanism, the IACHR increased the number of working
meetings, enabling 40 spaces for dialogue during 2018 to promote negotiation
and implementation of friendly settlements in connection with various issues
in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala,
Honduras, Mexico, Panama , Paraguay, Peru and Venezuela. The IACHR also
conducted four working visits to facilitate friendly settlement processes in
Chile, Honduras, Bolivia and Mexico. The Commission further held 20
videoconferences on various issues concerning Argentina, Bolivia, Costa
Rica, El Salvador, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru and Venezuela. Throughout
2018, the Commission held 14 meetings to review friendly settlement
negotiation and monitoring portfolios concerning Argentina (4), Bolivia (1),
Colombia (1), Chile (1), Ecuador (2), Guatemala (1), Honduras (1), Mexico
(1), Paraguay (1) and Peru (1). The IACHR also issued six press releases
concerning friendly settlements and sought to increase the visibility of
approved friendly settlements that attain a significant degree of
compliance.
The Commission considers that the progress highlighted in Chapter II.G.3
of the 2018 Annual Report is historic and lays the groundwork to optimize
the implementation of friendly settlements. In this context, the IACHR will
continue to make every effort—in its advisory, mediation and cooperation
capacities—to encourage greater compliance with its decisions.
“The IACHR acknowledges the efforts of States and petitioners to resolve cases taken before the friendly settlement mechanism and will continue to engage in mediation and monitoring efforts to facilitate dialogue among the parties, with a view to ensuring full implementation of all commitments made in friendly settlements,” said IACHR Executive Secretary Paulo Abrão.
A principal, autonomous body of the Organization of American States (OAS), the IACHR derives its mandate from the OAS Charter and the American Convention on Human Rights. The Inter-American Commission has a mandate to promote respect for and to defend human rights in the region and acts as a consultative body to the OAS in this area. The Commission is composed of seven independent members who are elected in an individual capacity by the OAS General Assembly and who do not represent their countries of origin or residence.
No. 080/19